rjbritton replied to your photo: Oops, I am sorry Christian. Didn’t mean to have so…
well, Clark is only 5’ 7” :0 although average, everyone thinks he’s such a shorty lolol
Hahah, right, but thinking about the height of people born around the same time as him, 5’7” wasn’t so short. Actually, looking back at the charts I had uncovered, 5.74 was the average height for males aged 20 to 39 in 1960-64 in the U.S., then it rose to about 5.8 feet in the 1971-74 bracket. (there is a gap in the data for 1964-71 but we can extrapolate)
We’ve had the “guys grow to be 6+ ft” burst somewhat recently.
So, Clark wouldn’t be a tall man by the time’s standards but he wouldn’t be a shorty either, actually. :/